2 studies show CRISPR might drive up cancer risk in edited cells

13 June 2018

Amirah Al Idrus / FierceBiotech

Off-target, or unintended, editing is a key safety concern of CRISPR-Cas9, as it can lead to cancer and other side effects. Two new studies show that CRISPR editing could raise the risk of targeted cells—those being edited to treat disease—developing tumors.

A pair of studies published Monday found that CRISPR editing triggers a mechanism that protects cells from DNA damage. Cells that have this protective system are harder to edit, while cells lacking it are easier to edit. The catch? Cells that are easy to edit could be more susceptible to cancer-causing mutations.

“We managed to edit cancer cells easily, but when we tried to edit normal, healthy cells, very little happened,” said Emma Haapaniemi, of the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden. What’s more, about half of all cancer cells do not have this protective pathway, the researchers said.

“When we looked at this further, we found that cutting the genome with CRISPR-Cas9 induced the activation of a protein known as p53, which acts like a cell’s alarm system, signalling that DNA is damaged, and opens the cellular ‘first aid kit’ that repairs damage to the DNA. The triggering of this system makes editing much more difficult,” said Haapaniemi, the first author of one of the studies, published in Nature Medicine. The other study, by Novartis, came to similar conclusions.

Editing cells without this “alarm system” could eventually boost the number of cells without protection against DNA damage. Blocking p53 in healthy cells slated for editing might be one way to “decrease the risk of selecting for p53-deficient cells,” but it could still open them up temporarily to mutations that cause cancer.

The news drove down stocks for CRISPR biotechs—CRISPR Therapeutics, Editas and Intellia, to name a few. And while the researchers are calling for more work to determine whether CRISPR editing “may inadvertently raise cancer risk in cells,” they also said it’s hardly time to panic. After all, CRISPR has weathered a couple of storms, including a 2017 study saying the technology caused masses of off-target effects that was retracted this year.

“We don’t want to sound alarmist, and are not saying that CRISPR-Cas9 is bad or dangerous. This is clearly going to be a major tool for use in medicine, so it’s important to pay attention to potential safety concerns. Like with any medical treatment, there are always side effects or potential harm and this should be balanced against the benefits of the treatment,” said Jussi Taipale, of the University of Cambridge, who led the work while at the Karolinska Institutet.


Previous publication Next publication

Media Center

  • 31 October 2018

    Scientists unveiled a more effective approach for assessing drug response

    Scientists from Eli Lilly and Company, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (New York, USA) and Sema4 (Stamford, USA) released results from a proof-of-concept study demonstrating that patient-derived cells offer a more effective approach for assessing drug response than conventional methods.

  • 30 October 2018

    Researchers developed an AI approach to identify antibiotic resistance genes

    Researchers at the University of California San Diego (USA) have developed an approach that uses machine learning to identify and predict which genes make infectious bacteria resistant to antibiotics. The approach was tested on strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis – the bacteria that cause tuberculosis (TB) in humans. It identified 33 known and 24 new antibiotic resistance genes in these bacteria.

  • 29 October 2018

    Expanding the reach of gene editing with a new CRISPR enzyme

    The CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system has been widely studied because of its potential therapeutic applications, but limitations in the number of locations on the genome it can target remain a major drawback. Now scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have identified a new Cas9 enzyme that they say can help CRISPR reach more gene mutations.

  • 26 October 2018

    Biotech Backed by Bain, Pfizer loads prime CNS assets into new biotech

    Pfizer has followed through on its pledge to divest a hunk of its neuroscience R&D, spinning several programs into a new company called Cerevel Therapeutics backed by $350 million in venture funding. Pfizer is contributing a trio of clinical-stage drug candidates—including a Parkinson’s therapy due to start phase 3 testing next year—plus a clutch of earlier-stage programs, while Bain Capital and affiliates stumped up the initial funding.

Read more